Data

Why HIPAA compliance in martech goes beyond business associate agreements: tracking litigation and FTC rules

Developing

A contributor article, not legal advice. It says many questions remain unsettled.

A minimalist desk with a graphics tablet, mouse and keyboard
Photo: Minimalistic workspace with tablet by Spnq, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

In 60 seconds

  • HIPAA regulates covered entities and their business associates, not health data as such; a direct-to-consumer supplement brand is not covered but is not "in the clear".
  • A BAA covers only the vendor that signs it and only the products in scope; it does not make a tool compliant.
  • A 2024 federal ruling vacated the part of federal tracking guidance on IP addresses on public pages; class actions under state wiretap and medical confidentiality laws have run since 2022.
  • Federal guidance says a vendor's promise to strip PHI after receipt does not cure a disclosure made via server-side tagging.

Impact Layer

What changed
A practical summary of why a signed BAA is only one part of tracking compliance.
Why it matters
Health-related brands that use ad pixels or retargeting can face liability even when a vendor holds a BAA.
Who is affected
Marketers at healthcare providers, insurers, and consumer health brands.
Martech stack area
Analytics, Data
Stack impact
Audit tags on pages about conditions, providers and appointments. Involve legal and compliance early.
Business impact
Moderate A contributor article by Kevin Haag on MarTech, not legal advice; the legal points are summarised as the author states them and we did not verify them against the rulings.
What to watch
Further court rulings on tracking technologies and state consumer health data laws.

A MarTech article by Kevin Haag, published October 9, 2026, argues that signing a business associate agreement (BAA) is not the end of HIPAA compliance for marketing tools. The points below are the author’s.

Who is covered

  • HIPAA regulates entities, not data: health plans, clearinghouses and providers that bill electronically, plus their business associates.
  • A direct-to-consumer supplement brand is not covered, but the FTC treats unauthorised sharing of health data with advertisers as a breach under its Health Breach Notification Rule, and several states have consumer health data laws.

What a BAA does and does not do

  • It covers only the vendor that signs it, and only the products and features in scope.
  • It does not make a tool compliant or transfer the covered entity’s risk-analysis duties.
  • Retargeting and lookalike modelling usually require the ad platform to receive protected data, and few vendors will do so under a BAA.

Litigation and guidance

A 2024 federal ruling vacated the part of federal tracking guidance on IP addresses on public pages about conditions or providers; the rest stands. Class actions under state wiretap and medical confidentiality laws have run since 2022, and class periods can reach back to when tracking began. Federal guidance says a vendor’s promise to strip protected data after receipt does not cure a disclosure through server-side tagging.

Our read

Treat tracking on health pages as a legal question first and a tooling question second. This is a summary of one author’s view, not legal advice.

Sources

  1. MarTech: Why HIPAA compliance in martech goes beyond BAAs (opens in a new tab) News report ·

    Source of all legal points; the author is a contributor and it is not legal advice.

Get MarTech Roundup in your inbox

What changed in marketing technology, why it matters, and what to do next.

We will email you to confirm. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Related stories